The biggest issue here is the UK Royal Wedding these days. I turn on the TV whenever I'm in the kitchen, and I've already watched the same wedding ceremony nth times.
Then, I got to wonder what had actually happened to the Korean Royal Family. My history teachers used to say they'd all died.
Is it true?
The answer is NO.
I searched all the sites for the truth and what I found out was most of descendants of the Joseon Dynasty ruler had lived unfortunate, unhappy, and miserable lives since the Joseon Dynasty had perished, just because they had royal blood.
> Yi Seok, Prince of the Joseon Dynasty
> Yi Won, the formal head of the Korean Imperial household
> Yi Jin, Princess of the Joseon Dynasty
Nevertheless, there are still some descendants as you can see the pictures uploaded above, trying to preserve the Korean royal culture in their own ways. That doesn't mean that they have an ambition to recover their power again, though! They insist that this is one of the ways to preserve the Korean heritage and it'd be more meaningful and persuasive if one of the descendants of Emperor Gojong, the last King of Korea, explains the history in Gyeongbokgung, the royal palace of the Joseon period, for example.
As long as what they do plays a symbolical role, I'd agree. Moreover, I believe there's something only they can do as royal descendants but it should be limited to something relevant to Joseon history.
Anyway, I feel like I get to know about Korea more thanks to this :)
Monday, May 2, 2011
Where are the Korean Royal Family?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't know why, but I'm so fascinated with korean royal family. Maybe because from the dramas that I watched. I'm so intruiged with their lives and I hope I can have more information about them.
ReplyDeleteThese days, many Korean dramas take 'the Korean royal family' as their plots, even though there's not so much information about them. That's why they mainly depend on their imagination! If I get to know more about the Korean royal family, I'll write on my blog again :D Thanks for visiting my blog!
DeleteI did never have a very big interest in cultures of other countries, but since i watched the drama dong yi lots of questions and wonders popped in my mind specially about the korean royal family. Ive searched about korean history, so sad that the royal family members are not that much recognized now a days. in my country we dont have royal families. if only we have one we will surley honor them. we will not ignore them because of the mistakes in the past, we will respect them because they are one of the symbols of our country whom deserves a considerable royalty treatment.
ReplyDeleteI like your idea :) Unfortunately, here in Korea, people don't seem to remember them anymore. Even my friends don't know if some of them are alive! Thank you for sharing your opinion. It's surely thought-provoking!
DeleteActually there are Korea former royal family member still living like commoner in South Korea. it was so many festival or activity playing in Seoul for attractive for local and foreign tourist. But why Korea need to paid the bill for those actor or actress on those fake ceremony? why just reinstall those official former royal family as the part for Country pride and attractive the foreign? refer to the History, Korean royal family are cut down by Japanese not the korean own people. The former Korea royal family remain the right to reinstall as the Pride of Korea!
ReplyDeleteMy mom is a descendant of sejong the great.
ReplyDeleteeveryone seems to be a descendant of sejong the great because my mom claims the same.
Deletei am fascinated by the dress of Korean.it is beautiful...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI want Korea to become a constitusional monarchy .te south Korea should understand they confiscated all the wealth of the great royal family .I'm a Filipin but I respect the royal family even though the Korea is not. A monarchy
ReplyDeleteIt's really great to know this fact.. indeed i also agree that if joseon royal family can be acknowledged again by public, as it was one of korea identity and heritage. I was so attracted while watching korean drama especially the one that expose joseon era, but it kinda sad to know the fact the royal family descendant do not live well.. :(.. look forward to see another review about the joseon royal family from you.
ReplyDeleteWe wish to see the royal blood taking care of their people...v r happy for korea
ReplyDeletethank u for your article...eversince i started watching korean historical drama like dong yi, i took interest in your culture and heritage especialy the joseon dynasty..and wonder where they are now and the places where they lived in..i hope they are still preserved, and the descendants may be given recognition as great part of Korea's pride and history... by the way im a filipina and wishing to visit your great country Korea soon ..
ReplyDeleteWe are lucky that we still have our royal family and we do respect them.so when other people from other countries talk about their beautiful princes and princesses,we can actually relate to them.its a sad thing that korean has lost an important part in their history.
ReplyDeleteThe True Royal Family Of Korea Is Hidden By God.
ReplyDeleteThe True Royal Family Of Korea Is Hidden By GOD...HE is yet to reveal their identities.
ReplyDeleteIt's pathetic that people have to pretend to be royalty just to feel like they are something special. JUST PATHETIC!!! 이상해.
ReplyDeleteyou shut your ****ing mouth!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am from sri lanka and I hate this foolish country. but I love south korea from this world the most
DeleteInteresante
ReplyDeleteLe impresionante su historia triste que desgracia sus hermanos le encontre familia real una princesa Yi Jin hermosa☺
ReplyDeleteOkcha Lee, anyone know of her lineage? Looking into a past history that is long forgotten. She has passed many years ago, but claimed a royal lineage that was confirmed upon her death. It was said that the family disowned her for marrying an American and leaving South Korea many, many, years ago.
ReplyDeleteMy dad came from the royal blood of SILLA from LOOONNNNGGG time ago, so basically i'm the princess of Korea. LOL
ReplyDeleteOmg same! It would be cool if we were related somehow, maybe half sisters?
ReplyDeleteKoreans claim that their race and the royal family is lineaged from Rama of the Hindoo land of India
ReplyDeleteAre Koreans proud of their lineage to Rama ? Y ? I thought Koreans read history and follow Mahayana Buddhism !
Is Rama the role Model of the Koreans ?
How can a Korean or a Hindoo even consider Rama as a God or a Prophet or a Messenger or a Seer
Sita called Rama an Impotent Pansy
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Sita-says-Rama-is-Impotent-Pansy.htm
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[Sarga] 30
किम् त्वा अमन्यत वैदेहः पिता मे मिथिला अधिपः | राम जामातरम् प्राप्य स्त्रियम् पुरुष विग्रहम् || २-३०-३
“What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”
अनृतम् बल लोको अयम् अज्ञानात् यद्द् हि वक्ष्यति | तेजो न अस्ति परम् रामे तपति इव दिवा करे || २-३०-४
Koreans claim that their race and the royal family is lineaged from Rama of the Hindoo land of India
ReplyDeleteAre Koreans proud of their lineage to Rama ? Y ? I thought Koreans read history and follow Mahayana Buddhism !
Is Rama the role Model of the Koreans ?
How can a Korean or a Hindoo even consider Rama as a God or a Prophet or a Messenger or a Seer
Rama told Sita to whore herself- this is in the Valmiki Ramayana
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Rama-Tells-Sita-to-whore-herself.htm
Chapter [Sarga] 115
तद्गच्छ त्वानुजानेऽद्य यथेष्टं जनकात्मजे |
एता दश दिशो भद्रे कार्यमस्ति न मे त्वया || ६-११५-१८
“O Seetha! That is why, I am permitting you now. Go wherever you like. All these ten directions are open to you, my dear lady! There is no work to be done to me, by you.”
तदद्य व्याहृतं भद्रे मयैतत् कृतबुद्धिना |
लक्ष्मणे वाथ भरते कुरु बुद्धिं यथासुखम् || ६-११५-२२
“O gracious lady! Therefore, this has been spoken by me today, with a resolved mind. Set you mind on Lakshmana or Bharata, as per your ease.”
įatrughne vätha sugréve räkņase vä vibhéņaëe |
niveįaya manaų séte yathä vä sukhamätmanaų || 6-115-23
“O Seetha! Otherwise, set your mind either on Shatrughna or on Sugreeva or on Vibhishana the demon; or according to your own comfort.”
Koreans claim that their race and the royal family is lineaged from Rama of the Hindoo land of India
ReplyDeleteAre Koreans proud of their lineage to Rama ? Y ? I thought Koreans read history and follow Mahayana Buddhism !
Is Rama the role Model of the Koreans ?
How can a Korean or a Hindoo even consider Rama as a God or a Prophet or a Messenger or a Seer
Rama;s mother had sex with a Horse !
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Kaushalya-has-sex-with-a-Live-Horse.htm
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 14
Queen Kausalya desiring the results of ritual disconcertedly resided one night with that horse that flew away like a bird. [1-14-34]
Koreans claim that their race and the royal family is lineaged from Rama of the Hindoo land of India
ReplyDeleteAre Koreans proud of their lineage to Rama ? Y ? I thought Koreans read history and follow Mahayana Buddhism !
Is Rama the role Model of the Koreans ?
How can a Korean or a Hindoo even consider Rama as a God or a Prophet or a Messenger or a Seer
Was Rama a Gay Monkey ?
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Is-Rama-a-Gay-Monkey–f-.htm
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 128
आजानुलम्बिबाहुश्च महास्कन्धः प्रतापवान् |
लक्ष्मणानुचरो रामः पृथिवीमन्वपालयत् || ६-१२८-९७
That Rama, having his long arms reaching down his knees, having a broad chest and glorious, ruled this earth with Lakshmana as his companion.
No humans has arms reaching to the knees ! Is Rama an Ape ?
Rama ruled for 10000 years with Lakshmana – as HIS COMPANION ? What about Seeta Maiya ? What do have here ? A Gay Monkey !
Rama spent 12 years with Lakshmana and Apes, with no sex with a woman – so he became Gay –so what – it is all evolution !
As per Ramayana – Rama ruled happily ever after for 1000 years, with Lakshmana by his side (not Seeta) – it is all the Gay Thing (although Uttarakandam says that Rama and Seeta made merry for 10000 years – as miya bibi – but that was to neuter the Gay Theory of the Valmiki Ramayana)
Also, the Ramayana says that Rama had hands till his knees, and that explains his love and fondness for all apes and monkeys
Rama the Limpdick spent 12 years with Lakshmana, in a jungle, with no sex – and was sexually frustrated , and then Vali was banging his brother’s wife – and so, Rama the Limpdick killed Vali – it is all OK La !
This is Oral Sex in the Ramayana !
ReplyDeleteSita performs Fellatio on Ravana ! Ravana was an African and deeply dis-satisfied with her husband !
The Satanic Verse is that Ravana made Seeta perform fellatio ! dindooohindoo !
Book III : Aranya Kanda – The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 52
तस्यास्तत्सुनसं वक्त्रमाकाशे रावणाङ्कगम्।
न रराज विना रामं विनालमिव पङ्कजम्।।3.52.18।।
Sita’s face with her beautiful nose on Ravana’s lap and not on Rama’s, shone no more like a lotus without its stalk.
NOTE – SITA’S NOSE WAS IN RAVANA’S LAP ! WHAT WAS HER NOSE DOING IN RAVANA;’S LAP ? THE NOSE IS NEAR THE MOUTH ! IT IS FELLATIO !
बभूव जलदं नीलं भित्त्वा चन्द्र इवोदितः।
सुललाटं सुकेशान्तं पद्मगर्भाभमव्रणम्।।3.52.19।।
शुक्लैस्सुविमलैर्दन्तै प्रभावद्भिरलङ्कृतम्।
तस्यास्तद्विमलं वक्त्रमाकाशे रावणाङ्कगम्।।3.52.20।।
रुदितं व्यपमृष्टास्रं चन्द्रवत्प्रियदर्शनम्।
सुनासं चारुताम्रोष्ठमाकाशे हाटकप्रभम्।।3.52.21।।
Sita’s face looked beautiful with her smooth forehead, shining hair and spotless complexion like the inside of a lotus, with clean, white, shining teeth, a nice nose and lovely red lips. She was continuously weeping and wiping her tears. Her face which was pleasing like the Moon on the lap of Ravana appeared as though the Moon was rising through dark clouds.
NOTE THE FELLATIO POSE – WHITE TEETH AND RED LIPS ! NOTE THE RAVANA TONE – MOON RISING THROUGH DARK CLOUDS ! THE CLIMACTIC EJACULATION !
The Proof that Seeta Maiya went willingly with Ravana as she was a lonely and sexually frustrated Nepali whore.dindooohindoo
ReplyDeleteThe fact that Rama was an impotent limpdick and a gay pansy,is undisputable - so we leave that at this stage
PART 1
1st let us settle the matter that Seeta was a lonely,frustrated Nepali whore
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 53
ईदृशम् गर्हितम् कर्म कथम् कृत्वा न लज्जसे |
स्त्रियाः च हरणम् नीच रहिते च परस्य च || ३-५३-७
"A woman, that too a lonely one, that too the other man's wife, that too an abduction, but not winning or wooing her... you knave, on your undertaking such a kind of deplorable deed, how unashamed are you? [3-53-7]
Note - SEETA MAIYA DID NOT SAY THAT SHE WAS ALONE.SHE SAID SHE WAS LONELY
PART 2
It is said that if Ravana touched any woman with intent of lust, he would die
Let us 1st prove that the Ravana touched Seeta with intent of lust.He described Seeta's breats and nipples etc. - but that is passe,as that is just vocabulary
There is specific reference in the Ramayana that RAVANA TOUCHED SITA MAIYA WITH INTENT OF LUST
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
Ravana who is "infatuated with lust" picked her up, which lady is disinclined for any kind of sensuality and who is verily writhing like the wife of King Cobra, and then he surged skyward and flew off with her in his air-chariot. [3-49-22]
ताम् अकामाम् स काम आर्तः पन्नग इन्द्र वधूम् इव |
विवेष्टमानाम् आदाय उत्पपात अथ रावणः || ३-४९-२२
Then people say that Ravana DID NOT TOUCH THE BODY OF SEETA MAIYA ! Lies
This is proof that Ravana touched her body,waist and naked thighs
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
वामेन सीताम् पद्माक्षीम् मूर्धजेषु करेण सः |
ऊर्वोः तु दक्षिणेन एव परिजग्राह पाणिना || ३-४९-१७
He that Ravana grabbed the lotus-eyed Seetha on lifting her up with his left hand at her plait of hair at nape, and with his right hand at her thighs. [3-49-17]
ततः ताम् परुषैः वाक्यैः अभितर्ज्य महास्वनः |
अंकेन आदाय वैदेहीम् रथम् आरोपयत् तदा || ३-४९-२०
Then he whose voice is strident that Ravana lifted her up by her waist and got Vaidehi up on the air-chariot intimidating her with bitter words. [3-49-20]
AND RAVANA DID NOT DIE !
WHICH MEANS THAT SEETA MAIYA WENT WITH RAVANA WILLINGLY AS SHE WAS SEDUCED BY HIM !
SEETA MAIYA MIGHT HAVE HAD AFTER THOUGHTS ! BUT SHE WENT WITH RAVANA WILLINGLY - PERHAPS UNDER SEDUCTION OR HYPNOTISM - BUT THE NEPALI RANDI SEETA WENT WILLINGLY WITH RAVANA
Hindoos are squeamish about the rape of Seeta Maiya.The fact is that Seeya Maiya was raped by Ravana and she performed fellatio on Ravana !
ReplyDeleteHindoo poetry has a poetic way of describing rape - as we will see later.dindooohindoo
Seeta herself states in the Yuddha Kanda that she was banged by Ravana
PHASE 1 - RAMA OPENLY TELLS SEETA MAIYA THAT SHE MUST HAVE BEEN FUCKED BY RAVANA
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda - Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 115
कः पुमांस्तु कुले जातह् स्त्रियं परगृहोषिताम् |
तेजस्वी पुनरादद्यात् सुहृल्लेख्येन चेतसा || ६-११५-१९
"Which noble man, born in an illustrious race, will take back a woman who lived in another's abode, with an eager mind?"
न हि त्वां रावणो दृष्ट्वो दिव्यरूपां मनोरमाम् |
मर्षयेत चिरं सीते स्वगृहे पर्यवस्थिताम् || ६-११५-२४
"Seeing you, who are endowed with a beautiful form and attractive to the sense, detained for long in his abode, Ravana could not have endured your separation."
PHASE 2 - SEETA HERSELF ADMITS THAT SHE WAS DRY FUCKED BY RAVANA - BUT WHILE SHE WAS LAID - HER HEART HAD ONLY RAMA THE LIMPDICK ! THESE ARE THE WORDS OF SEETA MAIYA !
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda - Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 116
यद्यहं गात्रसंस्पर्शं गतास्मि विवशा प्रभो |
कामकारो न मे तत्र दैवं तत्रापराध्यति || ६-११६-८
"O lord! It was not my willfulness, when I came into contact with the person of Ravana. I was helpless. My adverse fate was to blame on that score."
मदधीनं तु यत्तन्मे हृदयं त्वयि वर्तते |
पराधीनेषु गात्रेषु किं करिष्याम्यनीश्वरा || ६-११६-९
"My heart, which was subservient to me, was abiding in you. What could I do, helpless as I was, with regard to my limbs which had fallen under the sway of another?"
ReplyDeletePHASE 3 - THE CONCLUSIVE PROOF OF SEETA'S RAPE 30000 FEET IN THE SKY !
THE HINDU SANSKRIT POETRY OF RAPE ! dindooohindoo
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 52
उद्धूतेन च वस्त्रेण तस्याः पीतेन रावणः |
अधिकम् परिबभ्राज गिरिः दीप इव अग्निना || ३-५२-१५
When her ochreish silk sari's upper fringe is upheaved by air onto to Ravana, Ravana looked blazing like a mountain set ablaze, muchly and overly. [3-52-15]
NOTE - SEETA'S "UPPER FRINGE SARI" (wHICH COVERS HER BREASTS) IS "UPHEAVED ON TO RAVANA".RAVANA LOVED SEETA'S BREASTS - AS WE READ IN THE ARANYA KANDAM BEFORE.
तस्याः परम कल्याण्याः ताम्राणि सुरभीणि च |
पद्म पत्राणि वैदेह्या अभ्यकीर्यन्त रावणम् - यद्वा -
- च्युतानि पद्म पत्राणि रावणम् समावाकिरन् - || ३-५२-१६
Reddish and scented lotus-petals adorning that highly auspicious Seetha have slithered, but again upheaved by air they are bestrewn on Ravana. [3-52-16]
NOTE - WHILE RAVANA IS BANGING SEETA - THE PETALS THAT SEETA WORE ARE NOW ON RAVANA ! HOW DID THAT HAPPEN ? HOW CAN THE AIR PLACE THE PETALS AND THE UPPER SAREE OF SEETA ON RAVANA ? IT AIN'T MAGIC ! IT IS SIMPLE SEX ON THE LAP !
तस्याः कौशेयम् उद्धूतम् आकाशे कनक प्रभम् |
बभौ च आदित्य रागेण ताम्रम् अभ्रम् इव आतपे || ३-५२-१७
Upper fringe of Seetha's silk sari with golden glitter is upheaved in the sky, and with the reddish hue of sun in red heat of midday it beamed forth like a reddish cloud. [3-52-17]
NOTE - THIS VERSE MEANS THAT RAVANA "REMOVED" SEETA MAIYA'S SAREE AND SHE WAS "STARK NAKED".A reddish cloud is acceptable either in morning or in evening but not in midday since it is a bad omen. A BAD OMEN FOR SEETA MAIYA
सा पद्म पीता हेम आभा रावणम् जनक आत्मजा |
विद्युत् घनम् इव आविश्य शुशुभे तप्त भूषणा || ३-५२-२४
Seetha, the daughter of Janaka, with a complexion that is goldenly yellowish in the tinge of a lotus, moreover with her ornaments of purified gold, flashed like a lightning possessed in a dark-cloud, when that stonehearted Ravana possessed her. [3-52-24]
NOTE - RAVANA "POSSESSED SEETA MAIYA"
तरु प्रवाल रक्ता सा नील अंगम् राक्षस ईश्वरम् |
प्राशोभयत वैदेही गजम् कक्ष्या इव कांचनी || ३-५२-३०
She that Vaidehi who is so delicate like reddish leaflets of trees made that blackish bodied lord of demons, Ravana, well and truly lambent, herself becoming a golden girdle girded around the elephant like Ravana.
NOTE - LAMBENT MEANS HAPPY AND SMILING AND SEETA IS LIKE A GIRDLE CLASPING THE ELEPHANT ORGAN OF RAVANA
IT IS DUE TO THE ABOVESAID RAPE OF SEETA MAIYA THAT THE GODS "SHUDDERED"
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 52
सुप्रवेपित गात्राः च बभूवुः वन देवताः || ३-५२-४१
विक्रोशन्तीम् दृढम् सीताम् दृष्ट्वा दुःखम् तथा गताम् |
On seeing Seetha who is undergoing anguish in that way the sylvan deities physically shuddered in a worst way. [3-52-41b, 42a]
BUT IS IT RAPE ?
SEETA WAS A LONELY SEXUALLY FRUSTRATED WOMAN !
SHE GOT LOVE,SEX AND RESPECT ONLY FROM RAVANA !
RAMA WAS AN IMPOTENT,COWARD AND A GAY PANSY !
This is proof that Rama and Lakshman are impotent limpdicks who could not even sense or hear Seeta Maiaya's
ReplyDeletepangs and wailings.The poor nepali randi had to plead to TREES,BIRDS,RIVERS ! But none came to help the nepali randi
This is the state of the Godliness of Impotentica Rama and Lakshmana.These Hindoo Gods could not sense that their
woman was giving a blow job to Ravana - until the monkeys told them ! dindooohindoo
Book III : Aranya Kanda - The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
हा लक्ष्मण महाबाहो गुरु चित्त प्रसादक |
ह्रियमाणाम् न जानीषे रक्षसा काम रूपिणा || ३-४९-२४
"Haa, greatly dextrous Lakshmana... oh, rejoicer of your mentor... you are incognisant of me who am being abducted by this demon who is a dissembler. [3-49-24]
जीवितम् सुखम् अर्थाम् च धर्म हेतोः परित्यजन् |
ह्रियमाणाम् अधर्मेण माम् राघव न पश्यसि || ३-४९-२५
"Oh, Raghava, you have relinquished your high-life, happiness, and riches for the sake of righteousness, and though you avowed to protect your observants, you are unobservant of me who am being abducted by the unrighteousness itself. [3-49-5]
ननु नाम अविनीतानाम् विनेता असि परंतप |
कथम् एवम् विधम् पापम् न त्वम् शास्सि हि रावणम् || ३-४९-२६
"Oh, enemy-inflamer Rama, I reckon that you are an absolute controller of uncontrollable beings, I wonder why you are not controlling this kind of sinner, Ravana, indeed?" This is how Seetha started her cry in wilderness. [3-49-26]
आमंत्रये जनस्थानम् कर्णिकारान् च पुष्पितान् |
क्षिप्रम् रामाय शंसध्वम् सीताम् हरति रावणः || ३-४९-३०
"I call the attention of the flowered Karnikaara trees of Janasthaana, you inform Rama that Ravana is thieving Seetha." Thus, she is addressing the woods and others on the ground from air-chariot. [3-49-30]
हंस सारस संघुष्टाम् वन्दे गोदावरीम् नदीम् |
क्षिप्रम् रामाय शंस त्वम् सीताम् हरति रावणः || ३-४९-३१
"I pray you who are with the bustle of swans and saarasa water birds, oh, River Godavari, you promptly tell Rama that Ravana is thieving Seetha. [3-49-31]
दैवतानि च यान्ति अस्मिन् वने विविध पादपे |
नमस्करोमि अहम् तेभ्यो भर्तुः शंसत माम् हृताम् || ३-४९-३२
"I also venerate you, the sylvan deities that travel in this forest with diverse trees or, those that abide on the treetops, you may please inform my husband that I am being stolen. [3-49-32]
यानि कानिचित् अपि अत्र सत्त्वानि निवसन्ति उत |
सर्वाणि शरणम् यामि मृग पक्षि गणान् अपि || ३-४९-३३
"Or, over there, some few beings that are living over there on the ground below, I seek shelter of all the flocks of birds and hoards of animals, and I pray you to convey this news. [3-49-33]
Y WAS RAMA A LIMPET LIMPDICK COWARD WEASEL
ReplyDeleteCASE 1 - HE WAS BORN BY HIS LIMPDICK FATHER WHEN DASHRATH WAS 6000 YEARS OLD
Book I : Bala Kanda - The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 20
षष्टिर्वर्षसहस्राणि जातस्य मम कौशिक || १-२०-१०
कृच्छ्रेणोत्पादितश्चायं न रामं नेतुमर्हसि |
10b, 11a. koushika = oh Vishvamitra; jaatasya mama = birthed, for me [from my birth]; SaSTiH varSasahasraaNi = sixty thousand years [passed] ; ayam = this one [Rama]; kR^icChreNa = with tribulations; utpaaditaH cha = is produced given birth, also; raamam netum na arhasi = unapt of you to take Rama with you.
"Sixty thousand years have passed from my birth, oh! Vishvamitra, and this Rama is engendered at this age, that too with tribulations, hence taking Rama with you will be inappropriate of you. [1-20-10b, 11a]
CASE 2 - RAMAS MOMMY WAS NOT "IMPERGNATED BY DASHRATH" ! WHOSE SON WAS RAMA THE LIMPDICK.dindooohindoo
Book I : Bala Kanda - The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 16
ततस्तु ताः प्राश्य तदुत्तमस्त्रियो
महीपतेरुत्तमपायसं पृथक् |
हुताशनादित्यसमानतेजसोऽ-
चिरेण गर्भान् प्रतिपेदिरे तदा || १-१६-३१
31. mahiipateH tataH uttamastriyaH = those best ladies of king; tat uttamapaayasam = that, best dessert; praashya = on consuming; hutaashanaadityasamaanatejasaH = equalling Fire and Sun in resplendence [queens]; achireNa tadaa garbhaan pratipedire = then very soon they got - conceived.
Then on consuming dessert those best ladies of the king whose resplendence then vied with that Fire and Sun became pregnant after some time. [1-16-31]